The list is said to reveal a revealing understanding of what exactly regulators are both seeking and finding while carry out market conduct compliance audits.With regard to the issue in which auditors are focusing on, the review of insurers’ market conduct compliance, the dominating factor continues to be the subject of claims. This is revealed in a new report being released by Wolters Kluwer Financial Services. Wolters Kluwer Financial Services is a provider of compliance, content, and technology solutions and services, located in Minneapolis. The company has now released its fifth annual list containing the top 10 reasons that insurance companies are marked as being out of compliance during examinations of market conduct. In this list, property and casualty insurance companies are distinguished from life and health insurers. The list is compiled by Wolters Kluwer Financial Services’ Insurance Compliance Solutions group.

Senior compliance counsel at Wolters Kluwer Kathy Donovan, says that the issues involving claims history, an example being the timely handling of claim and the correct documentation of claims files, have without a doubt reached the forefront of those areas that are criticized year in and year out. She adds that such a pattern should function as an alarm for insurers, especially those who continuing to be awarded fines and other sanctions for noncompliance violations of these types.

Incorporating market conduct exams from across the United States for last year, content was reviewed and analyzed by insurance compliance experts from Wolters Kluwer Financial Services who allocated the criticisms to various categories. The top 10 lists for property and casualty and life and health insurance companies consists of those companies that received and were categorized as having the most criticisms.

Wolters Kluwer Financial Services’ general manager of insurance compliance solutions David Evans, says that there is a lack of conception that says that the market conduct information is easily accessible by going to the web sites of state insurance departments. He says that in fact, there is a real lack of availability of market conduct information which is quite often very hard to find. According to Evans, his company’s research and tools, among which he lists the annual top 10 lists, are feature that is designed to help insurers easily access the information they need, from which they can readily identify business practices that rank as being of significant regulatory interest, those that may have resulted in fines within the industry.

The recent assessment by Kluwer Financial Services indicates that altogether there are a total of 31 states that are offering online access to market conduct enforcement actions. Of these however, there are only a total of 16 that are offering it in a manner that can be easily utilized.